When we present our beatonbenchmarks™ reports, the section about why clients appoint a more expensive firm often gets the most attention, challenge and interest.
Of course, this doesn’t mean that 80% of clients always choose a more expensive firm, but it does mean that they are open to selecting firms based on demonstrated value rather than price.
This is true across the professions we measure. Our data for Australia shows the numbers are: 82% in legal, 85% in consulting engineering, 71% in accounting and 83% in management consulting. And in New Zealand the figure is 76% for consulting engineering.
If your answers and 1) High and 2) Low – you are in good company … please read on.
Beaton’s research into buyer behaviour shows clients will consider price options within a ‘zone of tolerance. This zone has a maximum price which clients are willing to pay, and a minimum below which they won’t go without risking quality. A firm’s positioning within the client’s zone of tolerance depends on the level of demonstrated value. A client will appoint a more expensive firm if that firm differentiates itself on their key areas of value.
The reasons for appointing a more expensive firm in the consulting engineering profession are shown in the chart below. Of the 85% of respondents who appointed a more expensive firm, the chart shows the percentage of respondents who mentioned each attribute that the more expensive firm demonstrated. For example, 20 percent of respondents who appointed a more expensive firm cited the firm’s responsiveness as a reason for their appointment.
When we unpack these ranked attributes and interrogate the qualitative verbatims in beatonbenchmarks™, we can intepret what clients really value and are willing to pay more for. The top three boxed in red are about knowledge and expertise, the next two boxed in green are about service and effort.
The top ranked attribute by a significant margin is the ability to demonstrate ‘Expertise in your area of need’, followed by ‘Understanding your business and industry’. The third ranked attribute is ‘Leading expertise’, which means that clients are willing to pay more for practitioners they recognise as being leading experts. There is no surprise here, and many firms invest millions of dollars on poaching experts from rival firms.
The valuable insight is that you don’t have to be the leading expert to command a premium price. You can charge premium prices if you demonstrate ‘Expertise in the client’s area of need’, based on ‘Understanding their business and industry’. Investing time and effort in developing demonstrable industry expertise across the firm will have a much greater ROI than a lateral hire program.
Reliability and responsiveness and ranked 4th and 5th respectively. This means that clients are evaluating what each firm and practitioner would be like to work with, based on their experience during the winning work phase. How much effort did they demonstrate? How reliable and responsive were they? How proactive were they?
Needless to say the process of demonstrating superior value and service starts way before the official tender process.
In summary if you want to compete on value and justify premium pricing, you need to demonstrate that:
One final point. The last attribute on the chart is Price. Our research clearly shows that when a firm demonstrates high value and cost consciousness then premium pricing actually has a positive impact on choice. That is, expensive, high performing firms who are demonstrably responsible with clients’ money are perceived to be expensive, but worth it.
beaton's research arm has an exciting new position for a Research Consultant based in our Melbourne office. (more…)
The way clients experience overall client service is a function of a professional firm's culture. This post explains why overall client service consistency matters to the sustainability and profitability of firms. (more…)
This post explores ways to deliver fair value to both their clients and professional services firms. It shows why one of the key elements of beatonbenchmarks research is an analysis of what clients consider to be fair value for professional services in any given market. (more…)
In thinking about NPS, I usually focus on two things:
These raise three questions for me. (more…)